dutck-engagement-news

Dutch Stakeholders Meeting on the Coal Chain Covenant: Disengagement is about Engagement

DATE
December 9, 2016
ORGANIZER(S)
Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, ENGIE, Nuon/ Vattenfall, RWE/ Essent, Uniper
LOCATION
The Hague, the Netherlands

On the 9th of December, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the utilities ENGIE, Nuon/ VattenfallRWE/ Essent and Uniper organised the Dutch Stakeholders Meeting on the Coal Chain Covenant in The Hague, the Netherlands.

The purpose of the meeting was to bring together important stakeholders from the coal supply chain and discuss the landscape of coal chain development and its challenges.

The main topics introduced were:

A key theme, whether it be a discussion about South Africa, Russia or Colombia, was the need for engagement; particularly of coal suppliers, but also other key stakeholders. In a breakout session to explore when and how to disengage with a supplier, the overarching conclusion was that ‘Disengagement is actually about engagement’. When exploring the role of disengagement in due diligence, companies are encouraged to drive collective engagement in their supply chains to help the companies and organisations they work with improve their social and environmental practices.

Another key conclusion of the meeting was the need for evidence-based reporting on the impacts of mining on human rights. Trust needs to be built to support shared dialogue and for government, the private sector and communities to progress and bring improvements. The presentation of Sector Wide Impact Assessment on Human Rights of the Mining Sector in Colombia report brought great insight into an objective, fact-based research developed by the very deep-thinking organisation – CREER.

The role of governments and related institutions was brought into discussion by the need to address some of the impacts of mining in the coal supply chain. The OECD highlighted the role of industry initiatives in the success of supply chains and concluded that more clarification and education needs to be made regarding the use of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas.

Martin Christie’s presentation about the outcomes of Bettercoal in 2016 and how we can bring change through engagement opened up conversations around the remedy and grievance mechanisms, transparency, engagement in countries where it is difficult to operate, etc. All of these themes are currently under review and developed by the Technical & Advisory Committee, who will continue to work in 2017 on the Review, Renew and Align of the Bettercoal Assessment Program.

Martin Christie, Executive Director of Bettercoal, said: “The support and engagement of all the stakeholders present at the meeting is absolutely vital in assuring social and environmental performance in the coal supply chain and to overcome its challenges.”

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

RELATED ARTICLES